region: have different climate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different climate 1.00
have climate 0.95
have warmer climates 0.83
have moderate climate 0.83
be with warmer climates 0.83
have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes 0.82
have climates 0.82
be with warmer climates poorer 0.81
be with climates 0.81
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(region, have different climate)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(region, have moderate climate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(region, have moderate climate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, have warmer climates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(region, have moderate climate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, have different climate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(region, have different climate)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(region, have different climate)