region: have moderate climate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have moderate climate 1.00
have climate 0.84
have different climate 0.83
have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes 0.79
be with warmer climates 0.77
be with warmer climates poorer 0.77
have warmer climates 0.77
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.76
be with climates poorer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(region, have moderate climate)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(region, have different climate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(region, have different climate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(region, have different climate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, have different climate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, have warmer climates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(region, have moderate climate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(region, have moderate climate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(region, have moderate climate)