region: have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes 1.00
more than polar regions 0.86
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.84
be with warmer climates poorer 0.84
be with climates typically poorer 0.83
be with climates poorer 0.83
be with warmer climates 0.82
have warmer climates 0.82
have different climate 0.82
be with climates 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(region, more than polar regions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(region, more than polar regions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, have different climate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(region, more than polar regions)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(region, more than polar regions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(region, have different climate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(region, have different climate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(region, have different climate)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, have warmer climates)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)