article: be more popular than ones made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents news article
Weight: 0.86
, report
Weight: 0.73
, item
Weight: 0.66
, story
Weight: 0.64
Siblings obituary
Weight: 0.78
, manuscript
Weight: 0.65
, diary
Weight: 0.63
, paragraph
Weight: 0.63
, fountain pen
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than ones made 1.00
be more popular than ones 0.97
be more popular than ones made of metals 0.89
be less rare than ones 0.89
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.87
be less rare than common ones 0.87
get more expensive 0.84
were available to few people in times 0.82
were expensive in times 0.81
be much more costly today 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(article, be more popular than ones made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(article, be more popular than ones made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(manuscript, were expensive in times)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manuscript, were available to few people in times)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(manuscript, were available to few people in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(manuscript, were available to few people in times)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(manuscript, were expensive in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(manuscript, were expensive in times)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(article, be more popular than ones made)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made of metals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(article, be more popular than ones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(article, be more popular than ones made of metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(article, be more popular than ones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(article, be more popular than ones made of metals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(article, be more popular than ones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made of metals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(article, be more popular than ones made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(manuscript, were available to few people in times)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(manuscript, were expensive in times)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(article, be more popular than ones made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)