ballet dancer: cut feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.52
, dancer
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.46
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.36
, pianist
Weight: 0.36
, musician
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut feet 1.00
ice feet 0.83
has physical part feet 0.81
have ugly feet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dancer, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dancer, cut feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dancer, ice feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have ugly feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dancer, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballerina, cut feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballerina, ice feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ballerina, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ballerina, cut feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ballerina, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)