dancer: cut feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.73
, woman
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.79
, ballet dancer
Weight: 0.51
, barre
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut feet 1.00
have yellow feet 0.85
ice feet 0.83
has physical part feet 0.81
have ugly feet 0.79
tape feet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballerina, cut feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballerina, ice feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ballet dancer, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dancer, cut feet)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(dancer, ice feet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dancer, ice feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dancer, tape feet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(dancer, tape feet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dancer, tape feet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, tape feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have yellow feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dancer, have yellow feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dancer, have yellow feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dancer, have yellow feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ballerina, cut feet)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ballerina, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)