barbershop: have red pole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, store
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, beauty salon
Weight: 0.34
, barbershop quartet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red pole 1.00
have pole 0.96
have red poles 0.90
have poles 0.84
have red 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(barber, have pole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, have poles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(barber, have red pole)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(barber, have pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(barber, have pole)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(barber shop, have poles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(barber shop, have poles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red pole)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have pole)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(barbershop, have pole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(barbershop, have pole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(barbershop, have poles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(barbershop, have poles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have pole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red poles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red pole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(barber, have red pole)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(barber, have pole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(barber shop, have poles)