beef: be cheaper than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than chicken 1.00
be more expensive than chicken 0.95
be better than chicken 0.93
be safer than chicken 0.89
be cheaper than lamb 0.89
be much greasier than chicken 0.87
be more expensive than pork 0.86
be better than pork 0.82
be healthier than pork 0.82
eat raw than pork 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(beef, be better than pork)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than pork)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(beef, be better than pork)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than pork)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)