bias: be problem in experiments

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in experiments 1.00
be held in scientific experiment 0.83
be held in experiment 0.80
be problem in scientific investigation 0.78
has state problem 0.76
be different from problems 0.76
be important in scientific method 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(factor, be held in experiment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(factor, be held in experiment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(factor, be held in experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(distortion, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(factor, be held in experiment)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(prejudice, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(distortion, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(distortion, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in experiments)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bias, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bias, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bias, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(factor, be held in experiment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prejudice, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(distortion, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(factor, be held in experiment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(factor, be held in scientific experiment)