binoculars: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.53
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, equipment
Weight: 0.51
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.33
, flashlight
Weight: 0.32
, telescope
Weight: 0.32
, lens
Weight: 0.31
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(binoculars, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(binoculars, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(binoculars, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(optics, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(optics, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(telescope, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lens, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(flashlight, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(binoculars, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(binoculars, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(binoculars, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(flashlight, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(flashlight, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(lens, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lens, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(telescope, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(telescope, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fiber optics, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(binoculars, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(binoculars, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(telescope, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fiber optics, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(flashlight, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lens, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(optics, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(binoculars, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)