biologist: use models in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
use models in research 1.00
study evolution 0.77
need study 0.76
study world 0.75
study 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(biologist, use models in research)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biologist, need study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biologist, study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(biologist, need study)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biologist, study)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biologist, study evolution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(biologist, need study)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(biologist, study evolution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(biologist, study evolution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study evolution)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(biologist, study world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biologist, need study)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(biologist, study world)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biologist, study world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use models in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(biologist, use models in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use models in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecologist, study)