biologist: need study

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
need study 1.00
study 0.94
study world 0.89
study life 0.88
study evolution 0.83
study chemistry 0.80
use classification system study 0.80
study physics 0.79
use models in research 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(biologist, need study)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study life)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biologist, study)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study evolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study chemistry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study physics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use models in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biologist, study)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biologist, study life)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(biologist, study world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(biologist, use classification system study)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(biologist, study chemistry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(biologist, study physics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(biologist, study evolution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(biologist, use models in research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(biologist, use classification system study)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(biologist, study evolution)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(biologist, study life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(biologist, study chemistry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(biologist, study physics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(biologist, use models in research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biologist, study world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biologist, study evolution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biologist, use classification system study)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(biologist, use models in research)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(biologist, study chemistry)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(biologist, study physics)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(biologist, study life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(biologist, study world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biologist, need study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biologist, need study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biologist, need study)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecologist, study)