bomb: be constructed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projectile
Weight: 0.59
, weapon
Weight: 0.59
, emergency
Weight: 0.58
, vehicle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.58
, nuke
Weight: 0.51
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be constructed 1.00
were built 0.85
were even considered built 0.80
be developed 0.76
be dismantled 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bomb, be constructed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(weapon, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bomb, be constructed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(weapon, be developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bomb, be constructed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(weapon, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bomb, be constructed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be constructed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, were built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bomb, be constructed)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bomb, were built)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bomb, be constructed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be constructed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, were built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bomb, be constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)