bomb: were built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projectile
Weight: 0.59
, weapon
Weight: 0.59
, emergency
Weight: 0.58
, vehicle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.58
, nuke
Weight: 0.51
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were built 1.00
were even considered built 0.92
be constructed 0.85
is are developed 0.80
were created 0.80
be developed 0.77
were designed 0.76
were devoloped 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(weapon, were designed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were created)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weapon, is are developed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(weapon, be developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(weapon, is are developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were created)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(weapon, were designed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(weapon, is are developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be developed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were created)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were designed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weapon, is are developed)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were created)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(weapon, were designed)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(weapon, be developed)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bomb, were built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, were built)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bomb, were built)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bomb, be constructed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bomb, be constructed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bomb, be constructed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be constructed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bomb, were built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(weapon, were created)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weapon, is are developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weapon, were designed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, were built)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(weapon, were created)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weapon, is are developed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weapon, were designed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bomb, were built)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)