weapon: were devoloped

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
were devoloped 1.00
were made 0.88
were needed 0.83
were created 0.78
were tested in 1950s 0.76
were even considered built 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(machine gun, were created)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(weapon, were devoloped)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(weapon, were made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(weapon, were created)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(weapon, were created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(machine gun, were created)