weapon: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
were devoloped 0.83
were made 0.79
were even considered built 0.76
were needed in ancient china 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(weapon, were made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)