brandy: is melville bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.65
, whiskey
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, flavor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.37
, lager
Weight: 0.37
, bourbon
Weight: 0.37
, cider
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is melville bad 1.00
go bad 0.90
has quality bad 0.87
be bad for us 0.86
be bad for body 0.84
be bad for health 0.83
ever go bad 0.82
drive bad 0.81
taste bad 0.81
be good for cold 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(whiskey, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(whiskey, go bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(drink, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(whiskey, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beverage, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be good for cold)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(drink, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, go bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for body)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be good for cold)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rum, ever go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rum, be good for cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(whiskey, go bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(whiskey, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(drink, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(rum, ever go bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rum, ever go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rum, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(rum, be good for cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(brandy, is melville bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(brandy, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(whiskey, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for body)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(whiskey, be good for cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rum, ever go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rum, be good for cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(whiskey, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(whiskey, be good for cold)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brandy, is melville bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)