brandy: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.65
, whiskey
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, flavor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.37
, lager
Weight: 0.37
, bourbon
Weight: 0.37
, cider
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is melville bad 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for health 0.81
taste bad 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
go bad 0.79
ever go bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whiskey, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(whiskey, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(whiskey, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beverage, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(drink, taste bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whiskey, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, go bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rum, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rum, ever go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(whiskey, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(whiskey, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(whiskey, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(beverage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(whiskey, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brandy, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bourbon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bourbon, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rum, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bourbon, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bourbon, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(rum, ever go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rum, ever go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(brandy, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is melville bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(brandy, is melville bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, is melville bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brandy, is melville bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(brandy, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(whiskey, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bourbon, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rum, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bourbon, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rum, ever go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(whiskey, go bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(whiskey, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(brandy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)