brick: be good constructing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings wood
Weight: 0.33
, concrete
Weight: 0.33
, granite
Weight: 0.33
, linoleum
Weight: 0.33
, paneling
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good constructing 1.00
be good building 0.81
be good for building 0.81
be used in construction 0.80
be used for for construction 0.80
be used build 0.79
be in building 0.79
be used building 0.79
is good building material 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used building)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(granite, is good building material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used in construction)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be used in construction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(concrete, be used in construction)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(concrete, be used in construction)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wood, be used in construction)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wood, be used in construction)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(concrete, be good for building)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(wood, be used building)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wood, be used building)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for building)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(granite, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(granite, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(brick, be good constructing)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(brick, be good building)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brick, be good building)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(brick, be used in construction)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(brick, be in building)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(brick, be good building)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(brick, be used building)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brick, be used build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(brick, be good for building)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good building)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(brick, be used for for construction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brick, be in building)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brick, be used in construction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(brick, be used building)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(brick, be in building)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brick, be used in construction)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(brick, be used building)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(brick, be good for building)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brick, be used build)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(brick, be used build)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(brick, be good for building)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(brick, be used for for construction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(brick, be used for for construction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good for building)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(brick, be used for for construction)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(brick, be used building)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(brick, be used build)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brick, be used in construction)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brick, be in building)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(brick, be good constructing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(concrete, be used in construction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wood, be used in construction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wood, be used building)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(concrete, be good for building)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(granite, is good building material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good constructing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)