bungalow: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home
Weight: 0.61
, style
Weight: 0.53
, accommodation
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
Siblings cottage
Weight: 0.35
, home depot
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.34
, hotel room
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
have bad reputation 0.81
is bad thing 0.79
has quality prices 0.77
seen as bad thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(style, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(style, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(style, is bad thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has quality prices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(style, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hotel room, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(bungalow, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bungalow, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(style, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, has quality prices)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bungalow, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(style, is bad thing)