bungalow: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home
Weight: 0.61
, style
Weight: 0.53
, accommodation
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
Siblings cottage
Weight: 0.35
, home depot
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.34
, hotel room
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality prices 0.78
be good company work for 0.78
look good 0.78
have bad reputation 0.77
has quality advantage 0.77
be good company work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has quality prices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hotel room, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work for)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(home depot, be good company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bungalow, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bungalow, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bungalow, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, has quality prices)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bungalow, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)