business: be at big city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.56
Siblings barber shop
Weight: 0.72
, department store
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.68
, software company
Weight: 0.67
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big city 1.00
be big 0.88
be at city 0.87
be at small town 0.81
be at town 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(industry, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(market, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(industry, be at big city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(market, be at city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(market, be at town)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(industry, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at big city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(market, be at town)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at big city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, be at small town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, be at town)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(industry, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(business, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(industry, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(business, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(business, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(market, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(business, be at big city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(department store, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(department store, be at big city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(department store, be big)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barber shop, be at small town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(barber shop, be at small town)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(barber shop, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(barber shop, be at town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(department store, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(department store, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(business, be at big city)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(business, be at city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(business, be at city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(business, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(business, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(industry, be at city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be at big city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(department store, be at city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(department store, be at big city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(barber shop, be at town)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(barber shop, be at small town)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(department store, be big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(industry, be at city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)