department store: be big

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.71
, company
Weight: 0.68
, store
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.82
, hardware store
Weight: 0.81
, drugstore
Weight: 0.59
, chemist
Weight: 0.57
, shopper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big 1.00
be at big city 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(department store, be big)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(department store, be big)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(company, be at big city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(business, be at big city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(business, be at big city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at big city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(business, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(department store, be big)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(department store, be big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hardware store, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at big city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(department store, be big)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(department store, be at big city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(department store, be at big city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at big city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(department store, be at big city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(department store, be big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at big city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(business, be at big city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city)