camel: adapt to desert

Related concepts

Parents	mammal Weight: 0.64 , wild animal Weight: 0.62 , animal Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.57
Siblings	bactrian camel Weight: 0.36 , mountain goat Weight: 0.35 , elephant Weight: 0.35 , donkey Weight: 0.35 , goat Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
adapt to desert	1.00
adapt to desert environment	0.96
be adapted survive in desert	0.93
be adapted to desert	0.93
be adapted in desert	0.93
be adapted life in desert	0.92
survive in desert	0.90
be in desert	0.89
be better in desert	0.89
be important to desert	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(mammal, survive in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(camel, adapt to desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(donkey, survive in desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(mammal, survive in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(camel, adapt to desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(donkey, survive in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(donkey, survive in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(camel, adapt to desert)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(camel, survive in desert)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(camel, survive in desert)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(camel, survive in desert)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(camel, survive in desert)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(camel, be adapted in desert)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(camel, be adapted life in desert)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(camel, be adapted in desert)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(camel, survive in desert)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(camel, survive in desert)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(camel, be adapted to desert)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(camel, be adapted in desert)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(camel, be adapted life in desert)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(camel, be adapted life in desert)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(camel, be adapted to desert)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(camel, be adapted in desert)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(camel, be adapted life in desert)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(camel, be adapted to desert)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(camel, be adapted to desert)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(camel, survive in desert)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(camel, survive in desert)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(camel, adapt to desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(mammal, survive in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(donkey, survive in desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(camel, adapt to desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(mammal, survive in desert)