camel: be suited to desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be suited to desert 1.00
be suited live in desert 0.97
be suited for desert life 0.97
be better in desert 0.87
be important to desert 0.87
be adapted in desert 0.87
be important in desert 0.87
be good in desert 0.87
be adapted to desert 0.87
be in desert 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(camel, be suited to desert)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(camel, be adapted in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(camel, be adapted to desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(camel, be adapted in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(camel, be adapted to desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, be adapted in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camel, be adapted to desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, be adapted in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(camel, be adapted to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be suited to desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(camel, be suited to desert)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(camel, be suited to desert)