camel: have flat feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flat feet 1.00
have large flat feet 0.96
have flat wide feet 0.94
have big feet 0.87
have large feet 0.86
have two feet 0.86
have wide feet 0.85
need feet 0.85
have fat feet 0.82
has physical part feet 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have big feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(elephant, have flat feet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(elephant, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(elephant, have big feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(camel, have flat feet)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(camel, has physical part feet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camel, have wide feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camel, have big feet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part feet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camel, have big feet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(camel, have wide feet)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(camel, have big feet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part feet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(camel, have wide feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(camel, have flat feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elephant, have flat feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elephant, have big feet)