camel: have wide feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wide feet 1.00
have flat wide feet 0.95
have large feet 0.89
have big feet 0.89
have broad feet 0.88
have big broad feet 0.87
need feet 0.86
have two feet 0.86
have large flat feet 0.85
have flat feet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have big feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(elephant, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(elephant, have big feet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(elephant, have flat feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(camel, have wide feet)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(camel, have flat feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(camel, have flat feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(camel, have flat feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(camel, have big feet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(camel, have broad feet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camel, have big feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(camel, have flat feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(camel, have broad feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, have broad feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camel, have big feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(camel, have broad feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camel, have big feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camel, have wide feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elephant, have flat feet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(camel, have wide feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elephant, have big feet)