carpenter: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
get paid little 0.98
get paid 0.90
is paid 0.90
make little money 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid little)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid little)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(construction worker, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid little)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid little)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(electrician, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electrician, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bricklayer, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(construction worker, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid little)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid little)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(construction worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid little)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electrician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(electrician, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bricklayer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bricklayer, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(electrician, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(electrician, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(carpenter, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(carpenter, get paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid little)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(carpenter, is paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carpenter, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(carpenter, make little money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, make little money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(carpenter, make little money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(carpenter, make little money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electrician, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electrician, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bricklayer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(carpenter, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)