ceo: deserve pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vice president
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.64
, executive
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, director
Weight: 0.34
, founder
Weight: 0.34
, chief
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
deserve pay 1.00
get paid 0.84
pay themselves 0.84
is paid 0.79
earn money 0.79
earn 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, deserve pay)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(executive, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, deserve pay)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(executive, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, deserve pay)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(executive, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(executive, is paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(officer, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(officer, get paid)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(executive, get paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(executive, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(officer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ceo, deserve pay)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(executive, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ceo, deserve pay)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(executive, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ceo, deserve pay)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ceo, deserve pay)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ceo, pay themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ceo, earn money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ceo, pay themselves)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, deserve pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(executive, is paid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(executive, get paid)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, deserve pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(officer, get paid)