champagne: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.74
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.58
, drink
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, red wine
Weight: 0.36
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be more expensive than white 0.85
is damn expensive 0.84
be cheaper than water 0.82
be cheaper than red 0.81
is damned expensive 0.80
be more expensive than wine 0.80
be in club expensive 0.80
be expensive in club 0.80
be at club expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(champagne, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bottle, be expensive in club)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(champagne, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(champagne, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(champagne, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(bottle, be expensive in club)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(white wine, be cheaper than red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bottle, be expensive in club)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(drink, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vodka, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bottle, be expensive in club)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(white wine, be cheaper than red)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(champagne, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vodka, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vodka, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(glass bottle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(champagne, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(champagne, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bottle, be expensive in club)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(vodka, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(glass bottle, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(white wine, be cheaper than red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(champagne, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bottle, be expensive in club)