chef: wear neckerchiefs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear neckerchiefs 1.00
wear hats 0.83
wear white shirts 0.83
wear shirts 0.83
wear uniforms 0.83
wear jackets 0.83
wear pants 0.83
wear blue check trousers 0.82
wear red scarves 0.82
wear trousers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cook, wear trousers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cook, wear trousers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear trousers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cook, wear trousers)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(painter, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(painter, wear uniforms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(painter, wear pants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chef, wear neckerchiefs)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chef, wear trousers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chef, wear white shirts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wear hats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chef, wear trousers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chef, wear pants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chef, wear trousers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear white shirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white shirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear trousers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white shirts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painter, wear uniforms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(painter, wear pants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chef, wear neckerchiefs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)