chow: have black tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.41
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, police dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have black tongues 1.00
have blue tongues 0.96
have purple tongues 0.94
has physical part tongues 0.91
have black tongue 0.91
have blue tongue 0.86
has tongue 0.82
has physical part tongue 0.78
be chows tongue blue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chow, have black tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongues)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chow, have purple tongues)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chow, has tongue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chow, have purple tongues)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chow, have blue tongues)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chow, have blue tongues)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chow, have purple tongues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chow, has tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chow, have black tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chow, have black tongue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(chow, has tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chow, have purple tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chow, have blue tongues)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chow, have black tongue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chow, has tongue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongues)