chow: has physical part tongue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.41
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, police dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongue 1.00
has tongue 0.94
has physical part tongues 0.91
have black tongue 0.90
have blue tongue 0.89
have black tongues 0.78
have blue tongues 0.78
be chows tongue blue 0.78
have purple tongues 0.78
has physical part tails 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongue)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chow, has tongue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chow, has tongue)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chow, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)