coal: be considered resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.63
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, fuel
Weight: 0.62
, ore
Weight: 0.62
, mineral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings peat
Weight: 0.56
, lignite
Weight: 0.52
, iron ore
Weight: 0.37
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.36
, gas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered resource 1.00
be considered energy resource 0.95
is important resource 0.93
get resource 0.93
is natural resource 0.90
has quality resource 0.89
is energy resource 0.89
is non-renewable energy resource 0.89
is non energy resource 0.88
be considered nonrenewable resource 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coal, be considered resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coal, be considered resource)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coal, be considered resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mineral, is natural resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(peat, has quality resource)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(coal, be considered resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(peat, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(peat, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(coal, be considered resource)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coal, is important resource)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(coal, is important resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(coal, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coal, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coal, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(coal, is important resource)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coal, is important resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coal, be considered resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(peat, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(coal, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)