cocker spaniel: is good pets

Related concepts

Parents	dog Weight: 0.80 , puppy Weight: 0.70 , animal Weight: 0.52 , medium Weight: 0.38
Siblings	beagle Weight: 0.42 , labrador retriever Weight: 0.42 , dachshund Weight: 0.40 , small dog Weight: 0.40 , poodle Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is good pets	1.00
has state pets	0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(beagle, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(beagle, has state pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(cocker spaniel, has state pets)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)