beagle: is good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.83
, breed
Weight: 0.63
, hound
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, hound dog
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.41
, small dog
Weight: 0.41
, poodle
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pets 1.00
make good pets 0.98
make pets 0.95
has state pets 0.93
is good pet 0.91
is good dogs 0.90
is dogs 0.86
has state pet 0.83
is good hunting dogs 0.81
be popular breed of dog 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poodle, make good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(poodle, make pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poodle, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(poodle, make good pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poodle, make pets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(poodle, make pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(beagle, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, make good pets)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beagle, make good pets)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beagle, make pets)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beagle, make pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beagle, make good pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(beagle, make pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beagle, has state pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, is good pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(beagle, is good dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beagle, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, has state pet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(poodle, make pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(poodle, make good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)