coke: be more expensive than crack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, soda
Weight: 0.65
, soda pop
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings diet coke
Weight: 0.39
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than crack 1.00
is more expensive 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(coke, be more expensive than crack)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coke, is more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(coke, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(coke, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coke, be more expensive than crack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)