coke: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, soda
Weight: 0.65
, soda pop
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings diet coke
Weight: 0.39
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
be more expensive than crack 0.86
is more dense 0.77
be inherently better than pepsi 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(coke, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coke, be more expensive than crack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(coke, be more expensive than crack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coke, be more expensive than crack)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(coke, is more dense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than crack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(coke, is more dense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(coke, is more dense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more dense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coke, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)