coke: be inherently better than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, soda
Weight: 0.65
, soda pop
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings diet coke
Weight: 0.39
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inherently better than pepsi 1.00
be than pepsi 0.86
be preferred over pepsi 0.78
is more expensive 0.76
be better at at mcdonald 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coke, be than pepsi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(coke, be than pepsi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coke, be than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coke, be than pepsi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(coke, be preferred over pepsi)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coke, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coke, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(coke, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(coke, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(coke, be inherently better than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coke, be inherently better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)