coke: be more popular than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.67
, soda
Weight: 0.65
, soda pop
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings diet coke
Weight: 0.39
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than pepsi 1.00
be more expensive than pepsi 0.96
be worse than pepsi 0.90
be more carbonated than pepsi 0.87
have more fizz than diet pepsi 0.83
be more dense than diet cola 0.78
be more acidic than club soda 0.77
have less calories than plain milk 0.76
be more heavier than diet coke 0.76
be more dense than diet coke 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(coke, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coke, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(coke, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be worse than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(coke, be more carbonated than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coke, be worse than pepsi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(coke, be worse than pepsi)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(coke, be more carbonated than pepsi)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coke, be more carbonated than pepsi)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coke, be worse than pepsi)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more carbonated than pepsi)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(coke, be more acidic than club soda)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coke, be more acidic than club soda)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coke, be more acidic than club soda)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more acidic than club soda)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(coke, be more heavier than diet coke)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coke, be more dense than diet coke)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more dense than diet coke)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more heavier than diet coke)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(coke, be more dense than diet coke)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(coke, be more heavier than diet coke)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(coke, be more dense than diet coke)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(coke, be more heavier than diet coke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coke, be more popular than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coke, be more popular than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diet coke, have more fizz than diet pepsi)