cola: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.63
, soft drink
Weight: 0.58
, soda pop
Weight: 0.58
Siblings coca cola
Weight: 0.71
, soda
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
suddenly taste bad 0.77
taste different lately 0.77
be bad for human health 0.77
is zero bad 0.76
taste better out of can 0.76
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better out of can)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality jokes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different lately)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different lately) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different lately)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cola, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cola, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cola, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cola, is zero bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cola, is zero bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cola, is zero bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cola, is zero bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cola, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different lately)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drinking beer, has quality jokes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cola, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)