communication: be among scientists important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be among scientists important 1.00
be among scientists 0.98
have important to scientist world systems 0.80
have important to scientist world wide systems 0.79
be important part of scientific method 0.78
be important in science 0.78
be important to astronomers 0.77
be feared among humans 0.77
be defined by different scholars 0.77
be between experimental groups important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(failure, be feared among humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(communication, be among scientists important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(failure, be feared among humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(failure, be feared among humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be important to astronomers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(failure, be feared among humans)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(infrared, be important to astronomers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(infrared, be important to astronomers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(communication, be among scientists important)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, be important in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, be important in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(communication, be among scientists important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(failure, be feared among humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(infrared, be important to astronomers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(failure, be feared among humans)