communication: be important part of scientific method

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important part of scientific method 1.00
be important part of method 0.92
be important in science 0.81
be among scientists important 0.78
have important to scientist world systems 0.77
be through technology important 0.77
have important to scientist world wide systems 0.77
be crucial in science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, be important in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(communication, be among scientists important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)