communication: have important to scientist world wide systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important to scientist world wide systems 1.00
have important to scientist world systems 0.96
have important systems 0.80
be among scientists important 0.79
be important in science 0.79
be important part of scientific method 0.77
be among scientists 0.76
be crucial in science 0.76
be through technology important 0.76
has physical part systems 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(communication, be among scientists important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important part of scientific method)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(communication, be among scientists important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(communication, be important part of scientific method)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(communication, be important part of scientific method)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(communication, be among scientists important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(communication, be among scientists important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important part of scientific method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(communication, have important to scientist world wide systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)