competition: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad 0.86
be good for buisinesses 0.81
be good in life 0.77
be in business good 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competition, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(competition, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(competition, be bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(competition, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(competition, be bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(competition, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(competition, be bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(competition, be bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(competition, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)