competition: has quality good

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
be good for buisinesses	0.85
be good in life	0.80
be in business good	0.79
is good thing	0.78
be bad	0.76
make us better	0.75

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(competition, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality bad)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(competition, has quality bad)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(competition, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(competition, be bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(competition, make us better)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(competition, make us better)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(competition, be bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(competition, make us better)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(competition, be bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(competition, be bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(competition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(competition, make us better)

Parents	event Weight: 0.71 , pressure Weight: 0.63 , force Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.59 , situation Weight: 0.59
Siblings	tournament Weight: 0.64 , auction Weight: 0.64 , olympic games Weight: 0.63 , water polo Weight: 0.60 , dart Weight: 0.54

competition: has quality good

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings