competitiveness: be important for economic growth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, trait
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, theme
Weight: 0.50
Siblings consistency
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33
, integrity
Weight: 0.33
, mobility
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for economic growth 1.00
be important for growth 0.95
be important in business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integrity, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(creativity, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(creativity, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(integrity, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(integrity, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for growth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(competitiveness, be important for growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(competitiveness, be important for growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitiveness, be important for growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(competitiveness, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(competitiveness, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitiveness, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(creativity, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(integrity, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(competitiveness, be important for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)