computer science: need calculus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
need calculus 1.00
require calculus 0.96
need math 0.82
have math 0.80
is math 0.79
require math 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(computer scientist, need math)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, need calculus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, need math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, need math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(computer scientist, need math)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(computer science, need calculus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer science, need calculus)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require calculus)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(computer science, require calculus)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, have math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer science, require calculus)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer science, need math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer science, is math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(computer science, require calculus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(computer science, have math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, need math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, is math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(computer science, require math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(computer science, need math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(computer science, is math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(computer science, have math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(computer science, have math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(computer science, require math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, need calculus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(computer scientist, need math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(computer science, need calculus)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(computer scientist, need math)