computer science: require calculus

Property	Similarity
require calculus	1.00
need calculus	0.96
require math	0.86
need math	0.80
require physics	0.79
have math	0.78
is math	0.78

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(computer science, need calculus)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(computer science, need calculus)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(computer science, require physics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(computer science, need math)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(computer science, need math)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(computer science, have math)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(computer science, is math)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(computer science, need calculus)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(computer science, require physics)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(computer science, require math)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(computer science, have math)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(computer science, need math)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(computer science, is math)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(computer science, require physics)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(computer science, require math)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(computer science, need math)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(computer science, have math)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(computer science, is math)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(computer science, require calculus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(computer science, have math)

Parents	science Weight: 0.83 , technology Weight: 0.75 , computer program Weight: 0.74 , computer scientist Weight: 0.73
Siblings	mathematics Weight: 0.72 , programming language Weight: 0.67 , artificial intelligence Weight: 0.65 , biology Weight: 0.62

computer science: require calculus

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

Remarkability from parent implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

Typicality inheritance from parent to child