computer science: is math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is math 1.00
have math 0.99
need math 0.96
require math 0.91
be intensive math 0.86
need calculus 0.79
require calculus 0.78
is science 0.77
be science 0.77
be called computer science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(computer scientist, need math)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer science, is math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, need math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, need math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(computer scientist, need math)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, is math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(computer science, is math)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, have math)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need math)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer science, need math)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be intensive math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(computer science, have math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, need calculus)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, need math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need calculus)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require calculus)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, be called computer science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(computer science, require calculus)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(computer science, need math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be called computer science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(computer science, have math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(computer science, have math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(computer science, require math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer science, be intensive math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(computer science, need calculus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(computer science, require math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, be called computer science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer science, require calculus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer science, need calculus)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(computer science, require calculus)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer science, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(computer science, be science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(computer science, be intensive math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(computer science, be intensive math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(computer science, be called computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer science, is math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(computer scientist, need math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(computer science, is math)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(computer scientist, need math)